Tuesday, August 7, 2018

Mental Stress 101by WCB of Alberta

( This posting was originally placed May 2011 )

For the past 6 out of 10 years I have had many thoughts pertaining to WCB and their actions, lost many hours sleep due to nightmares or frustration, the mind games that are played by them makes me feel like they are attempting to make me lose control of my thoughts. Why? I think so they can say I am a threat to their safety, as they have done to many other injured workers. I am not allowed to enter their building to pickup cheques, why I don't know? I never threatened them, but they write down what ever they feel at the time. I have found that if I rebuttal any conversation to my claims manager, I am them penalized by slow down of progress of my claim or payments not sent out at scheduled time, but the excuses are constant; waiting on supervisor consent, computer is down on the cheque writer,file is in assistance hands etc; none of this is on paper which is why I no longer communicate via telephone. To many conversations were re-written out of context or not even posted on my file. Managers claiming that their hands are tied yet an assistant is able to accomplish what manager claimed they could not; or stating that they are unable to change another claims managers decision, yet many changes have been made. Mangers refusing professionals or my request's ; 5 years later it is claimed as "offered" though I chose a different path; regardless of what was on file years before; becomes official statement.That pertained to the first academic training, which was I unable to compete in. It was the second academic training, less then a year later, is the reason of my criminal charges.
I attempt to start my own business, only to be told "I know nothing of business", therefore you must go to "Business Administration"! Academically challenged ? need the upgrading in order to compete academically? NO!, pass, fail or dropout we (WCB) are done with you. All that was 5 years ago and I am still dealing with the aftermath. Just now priorities are to catch up with what little I receive, after no financial income for 6 months, which was social assistance. I am again under investigation due to WCB keeping 100% of benefits and informing social assistance that I was in receipt of said benefits: yearly income statement from WCB is less then what we received from assistance monthly. Manipulation of information which caused Zero income for my family, which is under enough hardship due to 2 physically restricted members of the family, one adult , one child.
It is pathetic the way WCB Alberta is allowed to operate, they are like little children allowed to play without parental supervision.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Workers Compensation Of Alberta : On the Job Training ( new update)

I will say this is a start,but it is to late; but a good gesture as far as I am concerned, I have tried to gain employment in areas of employment that I felt I could do and it was mainly the way WCB Alberta handled the situation with the employers. The employers were scared to hired as it would drive up their premiums if an injured worker was re-injured and all the brunt of the injury would be on that NEW employer. I have brought this up to Alberta WCB a few years ago in the Appeals Process.
http://www.canadabusiness.ca/eng/summary/2475/
It is also on WCB website with more information, they claim it has been on site since September 22, 2008.
First I heard of it, not one WCB employee mentioned this to me in all the correspondence or conversations of the claims services staff, I also subscribe to the Workers Compensation Board of Alberta's mailing list for updates on programs and policies.

http://www.wcb.ab.ca/pdfs/workers/WFS_Training_on_the_job.pdf

Worker Fact Sheet
Website: www.wcb.ab.ca E-mail: contactcentre@wcb.ab.ca Box 2415, 9912-107 Street Toll-free: 1-866-922-9221 (within AB) 1-800-661-9608 (outside AB) Edmonton, AB T5J 2S5
Edmonton Ph: 780-498-3999 Fax: 780-498-7999
Calgary: Ph: 403-517-6000 Fax: 403-517-6201
Training on the Job (TOJ)
When it is identified that you are medically unable (because of the accepted work place accident) to return to your date of accident occupation, your case manager will consider suitable
re-employment assistance to meet your needs. Your case manager will initially determine, by
talking to your accident employer, if any modified job opportunities exist with them. If your
accident employer is unable to find you suitable employment, other re-employment assistance is
considered. The training-on-the-job program is one of the options available through the re-employment assistance program.
How it works
A TOJ program is an individualized program set up to help you return to work with either your date of accident employer or a new employer, learning new skills. This program is also an
incentive for employers to hire people who do not have the experience necessary to get into that
line of work. WCB - Alberta subsidizes (tops up) your wages while you learn these new skills in a different job*. This working arrangement is a win-win situation for you and your new employer. Your employer gets an opportunity to see if you are appropriate for the job, while you get an opportunity to be trained in a different job and return to the workforce safely.
Your case manager will review and determine your entitlement to a TOJ program based on your individual need.
* Depending on the details of your new position, WCB can reimburse your new employer at a decreasing percentage of the wages (e.g. 1st month – 100%, 2nd month – 75%, etc.).
**WCB does not pay overtime, holiday pay or the employer’s portion of the worker’s Employment Insurance, Canada Pension Plan contributions or WCB premiums.
Finding an employer
When you have identified a potential employer, WCB can approach the potential employer to determine if they are interested in sponsoring you in a TOJ program. Talk to your case manager.
Determining the length of the program
You, your case manager and your new employer will determine the length of your TOJ program
(usually three to six months) by assessing the skill requirements of the new job, your transferable skills and the time required for you to learn new skills to become a fully productive
employee.

They sure make it sound good but you notice that they have already set the time limits and the amount of income for the injured worker, Guess my first comment was damn close to the truth, just more corruption to get rid of the injured worker so they can keep on collecting Millions to set themselves in a nice comfy retirement.
http://www.eluta.ca/top-employer-workers-compensation-board-of-alberta
If this were a court of law I know my lawyer would say this is not a good agreement to many loop holes to trap the injured worker and release the WCB of responsibility.

I have been investigating the connection between Alberta WCB and the Federal Government as I have been told so many times that Federal and Provincial Governments have no say in the day to day workings of the WCB, in fact I have been told by MP's that I have requested involvement from (as provincial Government has done nothing to investigate the WCB) that any business with WCB is to taken up with my Provincial Government.
The only connection to the Alberta WCB and Provincial Government on employers and labour incentives is to join a injury reduction programhttp://employment.alberta.ca/SFW/340.html. Now why would the Alberta WCB and federal Government join forces and not the Provincial Government?
Is this a way stating that offers were in place for the injured worker to gain employment ?

To find their own retraining programs due to WCB is incompetent at retraining?
or is it a way of proving that they had options in place to prevent Mr.Clayton from stating that the WCB had no options available for him and therefore cut him off benefits and to find his own medications without any health care assistance? regardless there has not been anywhere else then the Federal site and the WCB home site that stated this option for the injured worker's of Alberta.

I have a few major reservation's towards this situation:

1) what about after training; the I/W's restrictions would still be there, it would take very little to cause a flare-up in injury , depending on the injury it self.

2) If this is offered in Alberta , why not the rest of Canada ? seems like a new cover story by these actions of the situation of the Hostage taking.

3)Why doesn't the Federal Government, Provincial Government and WCB all work together and continue the subsidies for the employee's life span until retirement and a top off of a percentage to compensate our pensions.

4) What prevents the WCB from making "DEAL's" with the "on-the-job-training-employer" to have the workers employment terminated as soon as training is done, that does not secure any employment in the future, as the WCB could in turn increase the premiums/ stop wage subsidy or anything they want to the employer as he is no longer training.

5) Why is it only open to Employers for training ; what if I want my own business ( like I have tried before) and have always needed WCB's permission ( even via Federal Government Business Grant application), that way I can guarantee "my own" success or failure instead of falling back into the same rut

6) Sorry WCB Alberta but you have proven to many times that you cannot be trusted with the authority over the injured worker, especially now when you are not part of the Provincial Government as you have so contently stated to injured workers over the years, only to crawl into bed with the Federal Government; of whom has been washing their hands of you since the Merideth Report was written up.

This Stinks Big Time of Political Corruption;WCB is still in control of the situation; with that said I am cut off now due to non-compliance?

There is still no protection from the abuse and manipulation of the Workers Compensation Board Alberta.

Reply from WCB Supervisor

Hi Ken,

I reviewed the information you have inquired on regarding a training on the job (TOJ). This has been a re-employment assistance option for many years. This is not in conjunction with any government agency. This is not a new option and if you look at our site you will find information regarding training on the job. I have attached the link below with the fact sheet which I encourage you to review:

http://www.wcb.ab.ca/pdfs/workers/WFS_Training_on_the_job.pdf

I cannot comment on what the Government of Canada has chosen to place on their website, as we are not a government agency. I encourage you to contact them directly if you have questions regarding information that they have indicated in their website. Please also note that the reason that Alberta WCB may be indicated but others may not, is likely due to the fact that not all WCB's may have this as a vocational option. Each WCB in Canada is governed by separate legislation and have their own policies.

If you are inquiring on your eligibility for a training on the job you would need to contact us in writing with your request and a Case Manager would reply to your request. Thank you.

Nici Denney
Supervisor
Large Employers
Customer Service and Disability Management
WCB Alberta
Phone (780) 498-4358
Fax (780) 498-4078

A case manager will contact me? So once again I am without a case manager, last time I ended up on criminal charges by WCB, for no case manager available.

You do not have one assigned at this time Ken, as your file is not under active management, but if you would like to send something in writing regarding a request for a training on the job, you are welcome to do so and a Case Manager will be assigned to your claim and contact you in that regard.

Nici Denney

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Mental Stress by WCB of Alberta

For the past 6 out of 10 years I have had many thoughts pertaining to WCB and their actions, lost many hours sleep due to nightmares or frustration, the mind games that are played by them makes me feel like they are attempting to make me lose control of my thoughts. Why? I think so they can say I am a threat to their safety, as they have done to many other injured workers. I am not allowed to enter their building to pickup cheques, why I don't know? I never threatened them, but they write down what ever they feel at the time. I have found that if I rebuttal any conversation to my claims manager, I am them penalized by slow down of progress of my claim or payments not sent out at scheduled time, but the excuses are constant; waiting on supervisor consent, computer is down on the cheque writer,file is in assistance hands etc; none of this is on paper which is why I no longer communicate via telephone. To many conversations were re-written out of context or not even posted on my file. Managers claiming that their hands are tied yet an assistant is able to accomplish what manager claimed they could not; or stating that they are unable to change another claims managers decision, yet many changes have been made. Mangers refusing professionals or my request's ; 5 years later it is claimed as "offered" though I chose a different path; regardless of what was on file years before; becomes official statement.That pertained to the first academic training, which was I unable to compete in. It was the second academic training, less then a year later, is the reason of my criminal charges.
I attempt to start my own business, only to be told "I know nothing of business", therefore you must go to "Business Administration"! Academically challenged ? need the upgrading in order to compete academically? NO!, pass, fail or dropout we (WCB) are done with you. All that was 5 years ago and I am still dealing with the aftermath. Just now priorities are to catch up with what little I receive, after no financial income for 6 months, which was social assistance. I am again under investigation due to WCB keeping 100% of benefits and informing social assistance that I was in receipt of said benefits: yearly income statement from WCB is less then what we received from assistance monthly. Manipulation of information which caused Zero income for my family, which is under enough hardship due to 2 physically disabled members of the family, one adult , one child.
It is pathetic the way WCB Alberta is allowed to operate, they are like little children allowed to play without parental supervision.
In all this time the WCB Alberta talks with me as if they are doing me a favor instead of their job, if they truly did their job then I would no longer be dependent on them, I would have been properly trained and succeeding into a new life and career.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

An Apology and advice to the Alberta Government

Before I go to much into this I want to say that all that has been written in my blog I still standby it.The comments on Government, Provincially and Federally are still responsible for the WCB's across Canada, with that said it has come to my attention (via freedom of information)that the Alberta Government has done somewhat of an inquiry into my situation. The information I supplied to the GoA,in all honesty,pertained to the actions of manipulation of financial and personal information (now it has included medical). The GoA had received responses from the WCB of Alberta and those replies are not answers, as per your questions about my claim;information was withheld by the WCB and only part of the situation was answered. WCB admitted that they did not give all the financial information and passed the blame to the department of Social Services. My main complaint was the double dipping into the finances that was claimed I owed to their department and that when I originally made these accusations, it was due to T-5 tax statements made by the WCB of Alberta for the years of 2003 and 2008, both to the extremes, 2003 claimed I made approximately $24,000.00 more then my benefits; 2008 stated I only made $943.11 when they also claimed that I was paying back $818.00 per month towards overpayments, which they withheld 100% and forced my family to Social Services.
Now how can I make $818.00 per month and yet only receive $943.11 for the whole year; especially when I am being investigated for not reporting the $818.00 per month, of which I did inform the Department of at the beginning of assistance, but a year later am told that I had to report it each month.During that time WCB had been ordered by the Appeals Commission to supply me with regular updates on my claim pertaining to financial interactions, which had obviously not been done. WCB also stated in their communications to the GoA that I did not comply with the Appeals Commission's request to hand over all WCB benefit cheque stubs, therefore I was non-compliant and they did not have to proceed any further. The WCB of Alberta has put the blame on Social Assistance and myself for their mishandling of my claim, but that does not excuse them from everything else that happened,(example; information handed to the Appeals Commission after the hearing that purposely defends the claims manager in the manner of financial mistakes made by "her" not by the payment specialist's). That then creates another matter for investigation,this particular claim needs to addressed directly and not by WCB staff like it has been for the past few years all that does is allow the WCB to keep re-writing information that will reflect accuracy of their financial statements that they have used to remove monies for the same overpayment numerous times. The GoA has been told lies and half truths by the WCB of Alberta pertaining to my situation, as well as the F.O.I.P office has taken a very long time to go through my information before handing it me (as of July 8,2009 I have only received half of it and was ordered in March 2009),with a large amount of information being withheld from disclosure.
I am apologizing to the Government of Alberta for many of things I have said towards your lack of intervention, mainly due to the information that the WCB has supplied back to the Premier and Minister's that did inquire into my claim, was inaccurate, half truths and dealt with the present finances; not directly with the complaints that were originally made to your office .
I would like to offer some advice to the GoA pertaining to the WCB and the claimants that contact your offices on a daily basis, listen to the injured workers and be more thorough on information received from the WCB, when WCB sends back letters advising that they made a mistake on a financial amount and inform you of the "real" amount and it is twice that original amount; then you should question the actions of the WCB and have things investigated immediately. As it says in the F.I.O.P documents that I have received so far; the replying agent for WCB,sends requests for permission and answers from another department before answering your inquiries.
One last piece of advise I would like to add Mr.Premier is that please let the complainants such as myself, be more informed of Government intervention and actions, that will cease any doubts of non-compliance by this Government. A investigation is needed into this organization,WCB is under R.I.C.O investigation in the States http://www.riskandinsurance.com/story.jsp?storyId=185931550&topic=Main ;the main difference here in Canada is that the WCB has judicial protection; the Justice Minister has been claiming to do "GET HARD ON ORGANIZED CRIME" well remember that CORPORATE CRIME is also ORGANIZED CRIME.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Friday, June 12, 2009

Manipulation of Information will go on forever more

This Government in Alberta with their forcefulness, uncaring for human rights and a passion for corruption in big business, will not intervene into this matter nor will they even stand-up for the people that they are supposed to represent. As long as they are in power no Albertan will be safe from the illegal acts that are permitted to be inflicted upon the public as long as their agencies and big business friends can make money off the innocent Alberta families that stand-up for themselves against this cruel and inhumane political province.

Since I started investigating my claim file , I have come across many instances where wording had been changed on my claim; from work restrictions to financial information. The financial information has been protected forever by the Appeals Commission by requesting that I hand over all my WCB pay stubs or forfeit any appeals pertaining to over payments in the future, as if they didn't have their own; I can only guess that with all the other situations that the WCB has been part of, that they only want my stubs so they can destroy any evidence I may have against them. The other information that has been manipulated shows how they are working towards a position that enables them to close my claim as soon as they are able to without my ability to start an appeal. This last manipulation lowered my injury from both hips and damaged vertebrae to degenerative disc disease, which is a condition that they have stated in other documents as non-work related, but with the other claims on my back since I originally injured it in 1992 WCB continually forced me back to work even though I was unable to have proper physical mobility.
With all the financial manipulation on my file there has been over $70,000.00 defrauded from my claim, yet they manipulate the files and charge me for the same crime, even then they would not agree on a fixed amount of money I had so called defrauded them of. It has recently come to my attention that they have taken certain over payments from me more then 3 times for one stated over payment which was for approximately $5,000.00 and I have found another that has been removed from me twice now for over $10,000.00, there is probably more but I am tired of rereading my file as it is three banker boxes full.
But manipulation of information is common within this Government and its agencies, whether it is a survey created by themselves or information that they refuse to show publicly; to saying one thing today and tomorrow it is a different reaction depending on who is asking the question or who told who to answer the question in the way that they want it answered (remember the free vote at the Alta legislature)
If I were a dog or a cat, I would have more rights, then I do as an injured worker trying to fight for what is right.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, June 11, 2009

IBEW 424 Where are you ?

I was there when Tim (present Business Associate) was working with George at dispatch, now he is least to my knowledge business manager, regardless of placement he knows my story as he was there from the beginning.
But the main part that gets me is why? ,(when George was alive) my situation was conflict of interest?
George was administrative to the IBEW and also on the WCB board, is this why I have not received assistance from my "BROTHERS ?
Having my rights been taken away?
No assistance for all the years of dues I paid?
Insurance is non-existent, how many years of payment to the employees benefit plan?
No representation other then qualifications for job placement?
My family has to live in poverty with no medical or dental for me and my wife?
We have to go through all this bull just because those I thought were there for me turned out only to be there to better there own lives?
When I worked for IBEW. it was all together or stand alone, thats why I stood to picket and fight the non-union (remember Hinton or A.E.C pulp mill)what do I get ?
No more I am now officially against UNIONS cause the brotherhood is not there.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Abuse and Coverup by Quasi-judicial system in Alberta

All information has been collected directly from Claim ######## November 9th 2007


 Tthe financial workings of the Workers Compensation Board of Alberta, it does not include all previous evidence that called for with Appeals Commission Audit.

On January 26th, 2006, I had a hearing in front of the Appeals Commission, pertaining to an audit on my claim. When the audit was about to be put in front of the Appeals Commission ,a letter from Murry McIntosh dated January 12th, 2006 warning the appeals commission not to proceed with the portion of the audit pertaining to the charges he set against me in October of 2005 as he insinuates that I am appealing for forgiveness on the alleged fraud (June 2004 requested an audit on my claim) or they would be subpoenaed into court (we agreed between us that the appeal was prior to said situation, although all audits pertained after the fact).

The hearing chair had voted in favor of myself, with the chair asking for an internal audit, the audits that were done by order of the chair were neither proper or accurate; here are the reasons as why I feel it has not been done correctly, even though I have been informed by WCB that it is correct and true, letter from case manager March 22, 2007

I. WCB claims that all cheques issued to in my name are considered income on the T5 taxation for the year 2003 states that I made over $44,000.00, which included computer, reimbursements, travel & meal allowance, loan/advance, school tuition and supplies, according to Revenue Canada only paid benefits were to be on T5, : repercussion of as of June 2004, caused my family to lose our GST rebate and lowered our child tax credits,: In May 2004, my WCB benefits were originally cut off , by end of May reinstated, which time my benefits were set at a deemed position as if I had passed my schooling and working in that profession.

II. Pre-accident earnings for 1999 listed at different amounts

• letter from Shirlyann Garlinski dated May 19th, 2005, states $58,280,93 gross pay

• Rate and earning detail dated April 8th, 2004 states $48,225.89 gross and $29,515.63 net

III. July 10th, 2003 and August 06th, 2003 payments were questioned by the appeals advisor as too why these payments were issued and then deleted creating an over payment? It was explained as duplicate payments, but would not produce canceled cheques as requested:

• Note on file by Romaine Nadue payment specialist May 17th, 2004 states that “ As for the reason these payments were issued and then deleted I do not know”

IV. Same overpayments removed numerous times:



• December 20th 2001 letter on file States ‘overpayments from claims 35801 & 40801 were withheld from retro payment.

• February 18th 2003 Rob VanDoesburg case manager letter claims 35801 & 40801 were removed once again by claims manager, explanation was “ it was talked about ,but never recovered”;

• February 17th, 2006 Lorinda Thome payment specialist memo audit states that overpayment from claim # 358 01 was recovered from TPD owed to the claimant of $15,249.31. (No date as to when this was done) leaving $10,810.33 for adjustment. Remainder went to non attendance overpayment, (3 years apart?)


• Lorinda Thome payment specialist March 20th, 2006 memo audit states $4,439.08 is still outstanding from claim 358-01

• letter dated June 14th, 2006 from claims manager page 9 paragraph 2 states that $4,439.08 is still outstanding from claim 358-01

V. Claim payment list dated February 25th, 2004 states that cheque # 367069* was requested on December 19th , 2001 for the period of 1/1/00 to 9/23/01 and issued on February 19th 2003 (over a year later and listed as an overpayment) with various amounts listed to the cheque:

• With the request amount and the payment amount the first request amount is ######## (exactly as list is written in financial information; true amount unknown) payment amount $13,597.68.
• request amount $1,564.64 payment $1,564.64,
• request amount $8,754.64 payment amount $8,754.64 ,
• request amount $37.17 payment amount $37.17 ,
• request amount $1,117.62 payment amount $1,117.62 .

* Yet cheque # 367069 was issued at the amount of $5,503.66 (with overpayments from previous claim and this claim taken off) which translates into $19,568.09 paid to overpayments which did not exist.
On the payment list there is a cheque #367068 which was written the same day for the amount of $1,261.36, although it is on the list with the amount of $1,207.14 along with overpayment deduction.


IV. April 2003 I requested an advance/ loan, which was granted to me with a 12% interest charge and listed as income, which has since been called an overpayment by WCB; with a 5 year with a payment plan that was to be ongoing to March 2008 @ $223.00 monthly payments: (The loan  paid off prior to this letter being written).

• Letter dated March 29th 2004 over payment details from Marg Sapkos payment specialist states that total of loan is $13,022.10 , with $11,015.10 remaining on loan as there were only 9 payments made out of 20 , interest calculated needs to be revised and additional interest added ( all payments are deducted prior to cheques released)

• June 29th, 2004, $3,022.10 calculated as interest which was manually added to the overpayment/ loan (double interest?)

• Lorinda Thome payment specialist November 2nd, 2005 memo states that as of 30/9/05 loan balance is $6,555.10


• Lorinda Thome March 20th, 2006 memo audit states the $8,369.21 remains outstanding on advance.


• Letter dated June 14th, 2006 from claims manager page 9 paragraph 2 states that $8369.21 remains outstanding on loan as per memo of March 20th, 2006. updated amount was requested

• Letter of September 18th , 2007 states that only $239.18 remains owing on loan

V. Although each audit that has been done the main reference to monies owed is from those charges, with each audit is a different amount calculated as to the monies owing for the same time period:

• Inquiry dated May10th, 2004 stating that there is an overpayment of $14,659.67 left on claim # 01.

• Marg Sapkos payment specialist memo October 26th 2004 further summary to March 29, audit claims $26,230.81 overpayment from nonattendance

• Mr. McIntosh fraud investigator October 2005 claims $22,872.73

• March 20th, 2006 by payment specialist Lorinda Thome states that $22,776.50 is left owing due to non-attendance at school.

• Shirlyann Garlinski , letter of July 14th, 2006, Quoting from memo audit of March 20th, 2006, that $18,337.42 overpayment was due to my non attendance.

• WCB lawyer claims just over $13,000.00, July 16th, 2007 court proceedings

• Shirleyann Garlinski claims manager letter of September 18th, 2007, quotes $19,308.23is remaining amount of over payment from not attending school, and $239.18 remaining on loan.

• Janet Welch case supervisor e-mail November 5th, 2007 states that amount owing now $14, 648.65. ELP benefits now listed $816.46 which is automatically going into over payments, has been since July 1st, 2007.


Court was concluded on July 30th, 2007; therefore I was already forcibly paying back on overpayment before a fixed amount was determined, the amount owed or paid is unknown to me as well as on the advance/loan.



I have no idea as to how much is owed or owing as all the calculations are mixed up, along with unmatching check numbers/monies not accounted for when compared to audit and other financial information along with monies proven to be removed more then once. It is unknown as to how many times the same monies have been removed and claimed that it has not been collected. January 26th, 2006, Appeals Commission informed WCB to list all deductions. To this date WCB has yet to co-operate.

From all that I can see from going though my file is that any cheques issued to me that state on them “user changes” comes back as an over payment, when I questioned this to my claims manager in 2003, I was informed that it was due to my changing of the payment schedule when I requested to have my benefit cheque picked up on a Friday instead of a Monday as it was already written up and ready to mail; however this was not the case in December 2001. There are many such cheques stating user changes when I was receiving benefits.

Along with the unknown amounts mentioned above; also unknown as to the amount of time frame that WCB has decided the monies are owed for:

• In letter from September 5th, 2007 WCB claims non attendance from April 7th, 2003 – April 30th, 2004

• November 2nd, 2004 letter states non-attendance from September 2003 onward.

• WCB submitted a claim on court documents for non-attendance to school from February 1st, 2003 to July 28th, 2004, (more then scheduled school).

• Court agreement between lawyers states that it was from October 13th, 2003 – April 30th, 2004

As of July 1st 2007, though my claim is still open I no longer receive benefits as 100% goes towards over-payments, I do not receive any information as to amounts paid and to my knowledge that when all collected , although claims manager stated that I would receive updates.

Although I had an appeal on February 4th, 2007, I was informed that the appeals commission will not deal with the over payments, just the audit that was requested by the appeals commission on January 26th, 2006, will be considered. Any appeal to the Dispute Resolution and Decision Review Body pertaining to overpayments will not be addressed again “as it was to be addressed by the Appeals Commission” letter of September 19th, 2007 from claims manager.


Thank You Sincerely

(Revised February 5th, 2008)

(Added April 8th, 2008)
As of receiving the appeal commission’s decision Dated February 15th, 2008, even with this information above shared with the commission, they found the audit to be correct and true. They therefore ordered I hand over all cancelled cheque stubs to WCB within 60 days of dated letter, to compare to their payment list or I am to forfeit any future claims towards audits. Appeals commission stated that a letter from claims manager June 14th, 2006 pertaining to monies owed from previous claim was written in error and had been recovered in 2001, but this does not explain the other letters from previous claims manager/ payment specialists audit or the deductions that have been removed for the said overpayments. The Appeals commission also makes reference to the information above,” as that they did not receive this information from WCB in the file package”.

UPDATE:
As of July /07, my family was forced to Social Services, September 2008 WCB informs Social Services that I am making $816.00 per month, I am then again under FRAUD INVESTIGATION, all assistance cut off. T-5 for the fiscal year from WCB $911.43. Hows that for Fraud and manipulation.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Monday, May 25, 2009

Provincial Government agencies all work together?

In 1999 was when I suffered my last work related injury ( which reoccurred for the forth time), I was forced into fighting for my claim with the Alberta Workers Compensation Board as my Doctor said enough is enough, to many times I had re-injured my lower back and hips, with over a year off each time; and each time to be cut off by WCB for what ever reason they came up with. This last time was a fight that took almost two years of paper and WCB personal shuffle, living those months I will never forget. First my employer Tracer Canada Inc, which is a company out of the U.S; who's representative had stopped my doctor in the hallway leading up to the examination room I was in. My employer's representative (safety officer) requested to the doctor NOT to list this as a lost time injury, regardless of what had happened; my doctor REFUSED. I then returned to the job site with more medical appointments for chiropractor,physiotherapy and my doctor for the next week. My employer then set me on light duty at work, mainly paper work of schedules and material confirmations. The safety officer for the company informed me that he would be taking me to my appointments so the company would know first hand what is happening with my injury,but when it was time for appointments I was informed I had to find my own transportation to the appointment; without my own vehicle as I car pooled to work, I was forced to walk/ hitch hike 5 miles to town then across town to the doctors office; while re-injuring myself along the way. That had happened 3 separate times and my employer making comments of "Alberta WCB's treatment of the injured worker was to lenient, this would never happen in the states; time to get the WCB laws changed so the workers can't be faking it". My last appointment with the doctor after he received the reports from the chiropractor and physiotherapist stated I could no-longer return to my trade as an electrician, so into WCB's hands I went.After two and a half months of WCB's physical rehabilitation, their answer to everything whether you are physically capable or not, which I wasn't. Due to the pain and immobility they inflicted upon me by their routine of therapy,which after three weeks,I had re-structured myself in order to decrease the pain and increase my mobility to enable myself to be there each day so I wasn't penalized or cut off benefits. It had come to the point of a supervisor making a comment to the therapist "why do we pay you when the claimant sets their own program, which in turn caused me more pain an immobility again to the point of not being able to lift myself out of bed or even to sit and get back up again without a type of mechanical assistance; it was then I was cut off and forced to fight in appeals. During my fight in the Appeals process the department of Child Services came into the picture, they had heard I did not have an income, the children were going without food and that I was abusing the children due to the stress of fighting the WCB. They then decided to monitor our household 24/7 claiming it would only be a few days, it turned out to be 54 days of constant watching, my wife and I were forced to sleep with our bedroom door open as we found a listening device beside it. My WCB files had been gone through as was all the information I had been gathering to enable me to proceed with my appeal, which some of that was copied down into our "baby sitters" daily statements.On the 54th day Social Services took our children into their custody due to my second oldest getting two swats on the butt for putting two rather large holes in the new drywall that had been completed a month before, of which the child had been warned that would happen if there was to be any more holes in the wall, which is why it was redone in the first place. Two years of fighting the department of Social Services, only to find out in the court room that they too practice file manipulation as does the WCB, those two swats on the butt with the flat of my hand were written down as multiple excessive punches upon the child's body. What all this had done to our family was devastating enough, but to have to live in a community that heard what the Social Workers claimed made living there very hard, threats continually, literally having to physically defend myself from others that didn't know me or my wife and friends going to odds with each other over this whole mess. As I was attempting to start my own business and everything else going, on we decided to move to the country so I would could show my determination towards and have less overhead for my business; which I was penalized by WCB for not getting their permission to move to that location ; but if I moved to the city they would have paid for my movers and covered first months rent(according to Rob VanDoesburg clam's manager, who was no-longer my claims manager after I moved)

In the mean time I had won my appeal from the WCB, even with the mis-information from my employer and WCB as I was able to show on file that they had conspired together on manipulation of information in order to have my claim denied and another year and a half later we won our court case against the Department of Social Services; although we now had four very messed up children, so messed up that one child had to be put on medications for behavioral problems (not our choice)that were created from being shifted from foster home to foster home.I found that WCB and Social Services both use improper medical and psychological tactics, even in using the worst professionals that are out there, re-writing information, contradicting themselves and posing a holier then thou attitude, all this just to show that worker or claims manger was always right and everyone else is wrong, to the point of withholding information from the professionals that were hired by my wife and I to assist us in correcting what ever wrongs we may have done; which we found out later in court we had not committed any wrong's.
But again WCB and Social Services have teamed up together, it seems that when they want you and your family to live in poverty they will go to any lengths to keep it that way, as I am once again facing charges from trying to keep my family fed, if I didn't then I would be on charges again for not feeding my family

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Appeals Commision of Alberta Who do they work for

To the Appeals Commission Hearing Chair

I would also like to make request of reconsideration of appeal #2008-161 due to the interest that has been charged on the $10,000.00 loan that I received in April 2003, last scheduled payment March 2008, interest was included in the payment schedule, then added again on March 29th, 2004, including early payout of loan(September2007) the interest is way above the agreed amount of 12%.
The monies that were withheld from me in December 2001 with the minimum known amount of $19,568.09 from 2001 that were used (according to the Appeals Commission) towards the over payments from non-attendance (years apart) also the amount of $10,810.33, (unknown issue date) that was withheld to the same non-attendance overpayment, not to mention the amount of $4,439.08 the was removed least three times from claim 000002 and claimed that it has still not been recovered by Ms. Shirleyann Garlinski, though it has been stated by the appeals commission that that was a mistake (Ms. Garlinski has informed me that WCB does not make mistakes), yet non of these were addressed clearly in the audit
Also I would to add that in the 2006 appeals decision that certain examples were used to assist the WCB in completing a proper audit, that’s just what they were “EXAMPLES” just cause they had been included in the audit does not mean it was a proper audit, nor has proper dates and amounts been included in the audit pertaining to information that I had brought forth to the appeals commission , let alone the amount of benefits that are to have been received and explanation of the various over payments that are claimed to be owed. In that Appeals decision the audit was called upon due to correct all financial matters owing and owed, removed and withheld.
Last but least, pertaining to canceled cheque stubs, WCB has their own copies which to compare too, unless there is a more viable reason that I should be aware of?

Thank you
Sincerely
Ken

So who do they work for ? The board wants my WCB benefit stubs to check against their records? Don't they have their own? My thought on this is with all the manipulation I have seen by this criminal organization, all they want to do is destroy my evidence of manipulation. I was also informed by my claims supervisor the outcome of this appeal 3 months before the appeal happened, this along with Mr.Murry Macintosh of who had gone to the appeals commission with threats of Court against the Commission if they were to go ahead with first Audit appeal; Lorinda Thome payment specialist stating that over payment had been collected and a month later state's in file that it still has to be collected. Are these the actions of a legit business? More on the criminal side as I and others see it. To have them vote in favor of a situation that was not even remotely done correctly, as well as refusing to view any evidence I presented as it being already known to the Commission, what about a letter they received "after" the Appeal was heard in defense of the claims manager of which I have yet to see? CORRUPTION AT ITS FINEST

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Who's the malingerer and abuser of the system?

I was last re-injured in August 99 and the 3 times prior,of which I was also off work for over a year by DR's orders. Each time I was forced back to work and each time resulting in more damage to my body.This last time has had to be the most strenuous situation I have ever been in my life of 45 years,with deeming of employment of an occupation that is stated for its high rate of back injuries; then there's employers that refuse to hire due to increase of their WCB premiums as I am "HIGH RISK" employee; to whom the WCB refer me too ? To the Labour Board on grounds of discrimination.

All my life I enjoyed inventing and being creative, with wood, metal or combination of both in many various ways, with electrical , welding and carpentry experience, creating was endless. As I had shown WCB of Alberta; my portable Work station.
My plan was simple to me as I already had a National Retailer interested, basic proto-type built and a Canadian manufacture ready to go on completion and testing of proto-type, all I requested was the means for materials and proper equipment.Since I started the portable work station, I have built many more multi-purpose tools that assist me in my injury; which was(amongst other plans) stated in my business proposal to WCB. WCB then hired The Business Development Bank of Canada to take over my "portable work station", their proposal on my behalf was way out of line,pertaining to my overhead costs and marketing, my calculated cost was at least 50% less and marketing already covered; but I was also given a 45% chance of success rate even though all I had was a rough proto-type. Needless to say this is how the rest started.Later I attempted to gain my own Government grants and financing to manufacture other items such as portable fencing for one, I was unable to gain any assistance due to being under the WCB of Alberta's care. I was informed it was the responsibility of the WCB to assist me in my endeavors, it was at that time I gave up on trying to take over my own life.

I was attempting to get out of the WCB at that time and since, as I already knew I hated dealing with them, from prior experience. The last time I was in WCB's rehabilitation center, I had to force them to put me in a work out program that wasn't causing as much pain and injury. First it was tread mill set at a speed calculated by the length of my legs and arms,speed was to fast and hand rails too low; almost fell on my face, 3 days for pain to subside.Next was a go-no-where bike,with a back and hip injury already, more of I cant do; all this was to raise my heart rate. I recommended climbing stairs , there at least I had a hand rail for stability and at my own pace.Later I requested a leg press instead of squats with a box full of weights,that was refused as well as anything else I wanted to prevent more pain and immobility, all due to the supervisors comment of "who are the trained professionals here". On account of the unnecessary situation I was put in, where I was unable to participate in my program from the physical results of the day before, I was denied benefits for the time I was not participating, for listening to them I received not only pain and immobility but financial penalty as well.
To me it seems as if anything an injured worker wants to do for themselves is prevented, even in their act it states that they are the authority of the claimant, in every way shape and form. If I were to hire a lawyer in a 3rd party law suit that caused my injury, I would need WCB of Alberta's permission to proceed.That is only if they allow it,you and your lawyer become property of the Alberta WCB. If you are successful, monies are not be distributed by the court without the permission of the WCB; which at that time you will receive after all legal costs accrued by the WCB, only 25%.
For any of you that have followed my blog or have read other postings,I am not a "malingerer nor an abuser of the system", but the more I deal with WCB the more I see of false accusations pointed from the very people that are guilty of the those accusations. Who's the malingerer and abuser of the system?

If you read the comment below you will see that WCB employees take great pride in their "LAW" that enables them to commit these crimes and abuses, along with the arrogance , mis-information and belittlement that they utter, just ask any employer what happens when they hire anyone that has had a WCB claim.It is also typical of WCB employees to send the injured back to work into employment that is neither compliant to injury or that the worker is qualified for. The WCB employee is a brain washing tool to the public and a liar and manipulator to the injured.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Fun TImes Compensation High

First a little about me, I started working out of home at 13 , while going to school, as a stock boy and later pump jockey. I left home by 15 with a last academic grade completion of 6. I wrote a type of equivalency test for a welding course at 17, which gave me grade 12 equivalent, tried trade school 2 years later, but was unable to compete academically. About 10 years later I attempted an apprenticeship, succeeded to 4th year, stayed a 4th year for 6 years, with multiple injury claims between , all pertaining to an original injury in 1992. I had low scores but enough to pass, at that time there was a push for tradesman an as long as your experience was there , you basically passed. However I knew I would not be able to pass the Provincial test.
After my last injury WCB wanted to send me to school for electrical engineer, I did pass the entrance exam for pre-technology course, but not knowledged enough in academics for completion. WCB refuse me upgrading as was requested by an educational Institution,so I wanted to start my own business, hopefully with a little assistance from WCB. Although I already had a national retailer to be an exclusive to a portable work bench that I registered as an industrial design.
WCB informed me that I know nothing of Business so therefore I must go to Business Administration. We will send you right back to school then you can make the monies needed to build your business; pass , fail or drop out we are done with you.
Well, knowing that I would not be able to complete again due to class qualifications, even the Institution questioned it. WCB got me in from stating "well he was registered last year", (April/May 2003)the secretary allowed me in. I had started an appeal almost immediately, knowing that it would be a few months before I got any answer, by October I had not heard from appeals adviser pertaining to appeal, left message, I contacted claim supervisor to inform him of my situation, he took my statement down and wrote its as I wished not to got school due to vehicle problems and other reasons on file. This is where the fraud charges from non-attendance to school originated.Turned out Appeals Adviser was no-longer working there and I wasn't informed, appeal papers sat on managers desk for approx 6 months, the one year time limit for appeal had passed .
Earlier that spring, I had already been questioning 1 overpayment on my claim that had been removed 3 times, with your basic runaround by claims manger, and other over payment's that seemed to accumulate over night. I then received my T-5 for the year 2003, floored me, thought I was the highest paid WCB recipient ever, but knew it wasn't true. I then went through my cheques, talked to Revenue Canada, was told to send it back to WCB and have them correct it. That never happened,I requested an audit of my claim; instead about 4 months later I am under fraud investigation, I told them I was happy they are taking me to court so I can show how they manipulated my claim file, everything was good, until court day. My lawyer had assured me that we could beat , then court day I am informed that "we do not" have the necessary information to prove manipulation, what happened there I still do not know. He informed me to plead guilty for defrauding WCB for the months of October 13th 2003 to April 30th 2004 or face jail time. SO I did, as a father with young children and 1 that is handicapped I figured he knew best, boy was I wrong.

The rest is all documented though my blog, I now have more information about file manipulation , pertaining to that time and since. OH yes in 2007, just before court, I received a letter from my claims manager that"I WAS"offered upgrading but chose a different path, apparently it was offered at the time I was scheduled for school, same time THEY refused it. Talk about Manipulating information, no other record on file pertaining to such offer.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,